Thursday, November 10, 2011

#ProudPSUforRAINN: Penn Staters fighting back

I was sent this email by RAINN, an organization that fights sexual violence with education, advocacy and services for survivors:

Dear ,

The recent allegations of abuse involving Penn State have shaken the nation. In response, a grassroots network of PSU alumni have started a movement - #ProudPSUforRAINN - to support victims of abuse and help Penn Staters display their true values by contributing to RAINN. This courageous effort will help ensure that something like this never happens again - anywhere.

In the words of campaign organizers Jerry and Jaime Needel, Bob Troia and Larena Lettow (Penn State '98):

"After having so closely identified with all things Penn State over the past 15 years, the recent events have shaken our beliefs - and those of other alumni - to the core. Simply put, Penn State is way bigger than the alleged actions of a few people. To honor the victims, our goal is to raise over $500,000 - one dollar for each of Penn State's 557,000 alumni. Please join us in showing the world what being a proud supporter of Penn State really means by making a donation in support of preventing and treating victims of sexual abuse and by adding your name to mine below."

Please support this important campaign by adding your name, making a donation, and joining the conversation on twitter at #ProudPSUforRAINN.

With gratitude,

SB Signature

Scott Berkowtiz

President & Founder


In the fight between good and evil, good has just fired a major salvo.

Wednesday, November 9, 2011

What I'm thinking this morning

myfoxphilly.com has reported that "there may [now] be as many as 17 accusers coming forward against one-time Penn State University defensive coordinator Jerry Sandusky." This is the monster who could have been stopped in 2002, when an eyewitness actually saw a sexual assault against a boy estimated to be about 10 years old, and four other people in authority at Penn State were told of what he witnessed, and none of them called the police.

I woke up this morning with a certain image in my head. I may have dreamed it, actually. It was of a courtroom, and the rows were packed with young men who had been victimized by Sandusky, (unknown how many after 2002, when five grown men could have stopped him and didn't). There were two or three rows of victims.

May there should be two or three, or more, rows of victims and their families in the courtroom at some point, maybe at the verdict reading. Then maybe the people who could have stopped Sandusky in 2002, and did nothing, could see the holocaust they enabled.

And yes, I did just use that word, and I intend to stand by it.

Tuesday, November 8, 2011

He could have been stopped in 2002

He could have been stopped in 2002.

He could have been stopped in 2002.

He could have been stopped in 2002.

That's the main thought throbbing through my mind tonight. He could have been stopped in 2002.

If you don't know what I'm talking about, here's a good place to start.

It should have been stopped in 2002.

Saturday, January 1, 2011

New sale price for For Cory's Sake the e-book

Happy New Year! $0.99 is the new sale price for For Cory's Sake the e-book--let's get that out of the way. At least that is the price on smashwords; other retailers may mark it up differently.

I've mentioned in various places that I work in retail. Well, Christmas season was so busy that I suddenly feel like I have so much time, now that the season's over. I've been spending a lot of this newfound time thinking about my book and my characters. I want to write about them, some more; and write about other things I've been thinking about. So new content should be coming to the blog, and in the meantime, there is this news: For Cory's Sake (the e-book) is $0.99. All royalties will still be donated to organizations that help abused, neglected or exploited children, and I will continue to spotlight these organizations and their issues.

Up Next: "So, I was watching this documentary. It mentioned the federal debt. I thought, 'I guess I can kinda sorta understand how some people can think we "can't afford" certain initiatives. But on the other hand, if we do hold back, will we be able to afford certain consequences?'" 't'will be these thoughts, in more words.


Thursday, May 13, 2010

Follow-up: So HOW can we cut health care costs by reducing violence?

In a previous post, I wrote that both academic studies and front-line health care workers show that: "our national health care costs would be significantly reduced if we could become better at preventing/reducing violence in our society." The next obvious question seems to me to be: "so how do we prevent/reduce violence in our society?"

I would like to quickly show you on to a very enlightening post on the Larry King Live blog. It was written by Anne Lee, President & CEO of Darkness to Light, an organization which educates adults on how to prevent, recognize and respond to sexual violence against children. Her blog post succinctly tells the why and how of preventing and reducing violence.

Key points:
  • "As a nation of taxpayers we spend over $35B annually for the long term cost of child sexual abuse."
  • "Unlike other issues and diseases where we need to raise hundreds of millions and billions of of dollars to go into a laboratory and one day find a cure--the cure, the end of sexual abuse is right in front of us."
Read about the cure. We can prevent needless human suffering.

(And cut our national health care costs as well)

Sunday, May 2, 2010

Sam and Corrin: Escape from "Vegas"

Between laying down and falling asleep, Roci makes up stories in his head. This is one of the personal traits of mine that I wrote into one of my characters. Between laying down and falling asleep, nearly every night, I think about the lives of imaginary people. I usually think about these people in the context of a scenario; which develops into a scene; which multiplies into multiple alternate scenes. The alternate scenes smash together; they meld together; their individual pieces pull on each other and combine; some pieces fall out as by-product. (I'd love to visualize the process as solar flares, but it's probably more like a chemical reaction in a beaker) My head is a beaker full of reacting fictional elements.

Most of what goes on in my head stays there. (Huh, a Las Vegas commercial just popped into my head) Much of it is about borrowed characters--Batman, Frodo, Brock from Pokemon . . . Much of it isn't to any point. I don't see the point in writing out pointless scenes; and I do see the point in keeping my Batman fan fiction to myself.

For Cory's Sake, though, was different--more original and meaningful to me; surprisingly cohesive and long-running; and finally, very insistent about getting out. It was beyond insistent. It got a wire hanger and picked my double lock of laziness and inertia. I actually began to write out my ideas as consciously ordered words in a word processor. I kept on writing, eight hours a day for a while. I finished a complete first draft--about 300 pages of beginning, middle and end-type stuff.

(I let the draft sit in a box for 3 years)

I revised, rewrote, revised and published, and it all felt very compulsory. I can say that I know what "compelling" feels like. A story woke me up and pulled me out, like an eager pup taking its "master" out for a run. An exhilarating (and exhausting) run, I'll add.

Now, I've been paying more attention to an older pet story, lately. Its characters existed and were doing things before Roci, Kerry, William, Jeffrey, etc.x 4 were ever born. And I've decided to take this one out for a walk; see where we'll go. So I'm writing again--I guess that's the big announcement.

The characters are two brothers who have differing personalities, and adventure(s). The settings are Los Angeles, Earth (where I lived for 6 years) and Cory. It is in part a story of how at least one Earthling learned of Cory (and naturally he told at least one other person; and two people sometimes keep a secret less well than one; and one thing leads to another, and eventually to For Cory's Sake)

The two brothers are Sam, who is 19 at the moment, and Corrin, who doesn't know how old he is. By the end of our journey he'll know, and I'll know a lot more too, and will hopefully see fit to share where we've gone within the pages of a newly published (on Smashwords, at least) book.




Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Violence Prevention Will Reduce Our Nation's Health Care Costs--Notes on a presentation by Susan Chasson

This month, President Obama filled out an NCAA Tournament bracket that, if looked at from one angle (focus on the middle), was even worse than mine.

Oh, and he signed health care reform into law.

This morning, I've been thinking about brackets, public health improvement, and . . . trees. (Yes, altogether)

Bear with me, Buddy Bear, and visualize a tree, please. It has roots and a trunk at the bottom and then it, um, branches out into branches.

So now, these trees we're visualizing have roots at the base, and bunches of branches, all big and pretty, up top. Now I think I learned in sophomore high school biology that important stuff does occur in the branches. I think the leaves collect stuff, like light and carbon dioxide and Easter bunnies (anyway, stuff) and I think bees visit the flowers and do things and then you get apples or stuff . . . I will not discount the importance, or fail to acknowledge the beauty, of the branches.

But I also know, from my experiences of seeing dead trees, that if you get an ax or a chain saw and chop or saw away at the trunk of a tree, and yell "Fore!" (no wait--"Timber!") and all the branches come crashing down together, their connection to the roots severed--well, that does it, right? Those branches aren't good for much more than composting the forest floor or feeding a fire or being decked with lights and decorating a living room for a month or four.

My point being that the roots are way essential.

A bracket looks a little bit like a tree. For those who don't share the least little bit in my sports obsession, this is what a bracket (my 2010 NCAA Tournament bracket on Yahoo!) looks like:




March 18-19

  1. Box Score - Recap
  2. Box Score - Recap
  3. Box Score - Recap
  4. Box Score - Recap
  5. Box Score - Recap
  6. Box Score - Recap
  7. Box Score - Recap
  8. Box Score - Recap

2nd Round

March 20-21

    • 1 Kansas67
    • 9 Northern Iowa69
    Box Score - Recap
    • 5 Michigan St.85
    • 4 Maryland83
    Box Score - Recap
    • 6 Tennessee83
    • 14 Ohio683 Georgetown
    Box Score - Recap
    • 10 Georgia Tech667 Oklahoma St.
    • 2 Ohio St.75
    Box Score - Recap

Reg. Semis

March 25-26

    • 9 Northern Iowa521 Kansas
    • 5 Michigan St.594 Maryland
    Box Score - Recap
    • 6 Tennessee763 Georgetown
    • 2 Ohio St.73
    Box Score - Recap

Reg. Finals

March 27-28

    • 5 Michigan St.701 Kansas
    • 6 Tennessee692 Ohio St.
    Box Score - Recap

EAST

1st Round

March 18-19

  1. Box Score - Recap
  2. Box Score - Recap
  3. Box Score - Recap
  4. Box Score - Recap
  5. Box Score - Recap
  6. Box Score - Recap
  7. Box Score - Recap
  8. Box Score - Recap

2nd Round

March 20-21

    • 1 Kentucky90
    • 9 Wake Forest608 Texas
    Box Score - Recap
    • 12 Cornell875 Temple
    • 4 Wisconsin69
    Box Score - Recap
    • 11 Washington826 Marquette
    • 3 New Mexico64
    Box Score - Recap
    • 10 Missouri597 Clemson
    • 2 West Virginia68
    Box Score - Recap

Reg. Semis

March 25-26

    • 1 Kentucky62
    • 12 Cornell454 Wisconsin
    Box Score - Recap
    • 11 Washington566 Marquette
    • 2 West Virginia69
    Box Score - Recap

Reg. Finals

March 27-28

    • 1 Kentucky66
    • 2 West Virginia73
    Box Score - Recap

WEST

  1. Box Score - Recap
  2. Box Score - Recap
  3. Box Score - Recap
  4. Box Score - Recap
  5. Box Score - Recap
  6. Box Score - Recap
  7. Box Score - Recap
  8. Box Score - Recap
    • 1 Syracuse87
    • 8 Gonzaga65
    Box Score - Recap
    • 5 Butler5412 UTEP
    • 13 Murray St.524 Vanderbilt
    Box Score - Recap
    • 6 Xavier7111 Minnesota
    • 3 Pittsburgh68
    Box Score - Recap
    • 7 BYU72
    • 2 Kansas St.84
    Box Score - Recap
    • 1 Syracuse59
    • 5 Butler6312 UTEP
    Box Score - Recap
    • 6 Xavier9611 Minnesota
    • 2 Kansas St.101
    Box Score - Recap
    • 5 Butler631 Syracuse
    • 2 Kansas St.56
    Box Score - Recap

SOUTH

  1. Box Score - Recap
  2. Box Score - Recap
  3. Box Score - Recap
  4. Box Score - Recap
  5. Box Score - Recap
  6. Box Score - Recap
  7. Box Score - Recap
  8. Box Score - Recap
    • 1 Duke68
    • 8 California539 Louisville
    Box Score - Recap
    • 5 Texas A&M61
    • 4 Purdue6313 Siena
    Box Score - Recap
    • 11 Old Dominion686 Notre Dame
    • 3 Baylor76
    Box Score - Recap
    • 10 St. Mary's757 Richmond
    • 2 Villanova68
    Box Score - Recap
    • 1 Duke70
    • 4 Purdue575 Texas A&M
    Box Score - Recap
    • 3 Baylor72
    • 10 St. Mary's492 Villanova
    Box Score - Recap
    • 1 Duke78
    • 3 Baylor71
    Box Score - Recap

SEMIS & FINALS

Nat. Semis

April 3

&

Nat. Finals

April 5

National Semifinals

    • 5 Michigan St.1 Kansas
    • 5 Butler1 Syracuse
    Apr 3, 4:07 pm
    • 2 West Virginia
    • 1 Duke3 Baylor
    Apr 3, 6:47 pm

National Finals

    • 1 Kansas
    • 2 West Virginia

NATIONAL CHAMPION

    • 1 Kansas

Tie Breaker: Enter Score

  • -

See?--roots and branches. Now, super important (and wildly entertaining) stuff does happen in those far outside branches, no doubt about that. But the really momentous stuff, where you (living vicariously through athletic young people) get to wear super-significant hats and T-shirts and use a Werner ladder as a pedestal and do press conferences wearing a net as a necklace, happens in the middle part, which--climbing back down from the metaphoric branches--we are going to have to call the "root" of the whole matter.

If you were to cut out the middle part of the bracket and stop the tournament after say, one or two games, you'd have an insignificant deadly dull dud, or the BCS. [Boise State for National Champion!]

Now honest, all this root and branch and bracket talk really is leading to an interesting health care thought. It's not my thought. I am a member of the Utah Valley Exchange Club, and we frequently hear presentations from individuals who are doing interesting and important things to improve our community and our world. This morning, we heard from Susan Chasson, Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner Coordinator (SANE-C?) for the Utah Coalition Against Sexual Assault. Susan has years of experience as a nurse practitioner; a law degree; and a part-time faculty position at BYU.

Based on her years of experience and her observations, Susan knows that our national health care costs would be significantly reduced if we could become better at preventing/reducingviolence in our society. In her experience, people who have been exposed to or experienced violence in their lives, are significantly more likely to experience chronic headaches, chronic abdominal pain, chronic back pain, substance addictions, health fallout from bad lifestyle decisions of all kinds, and so forth--even years and decades after the adverse experiences. Susan shared with us about several studies which support this idea (links to follow). So people know, both experientially and academically, that violence in society is a key contributor to a lower level of physical well-being in a society. Reverse the idea again, and becoming better at preventing/reducing violence will improve public health and lower our national (and individual, you know) health care costs.

Chronic conditions, substance addictions, unhealthy lifestyle choices, and the actions and costs associated with treating these symptoms are branches. The root causes of the symptoms are--well, the root. The symptoms of lowered public health (example: substance addiction) necessitate many branchy actions (example: rehab programs) at a great public and individual cost. If we could get at a root cause (example: experienced violence) in such a way that a significant number of these branches never form--well, my arboreal metaphor is beginning to shake a little, but do you see my point? If you strike at a root so a significant number of heavy, expensive branches never form, you'll get a much more streamlined, easy to maintain tree. Since we're using this tree as a metaphor for health care, that's a good thing, d'y'see? [Excuse me--the metaphor police are at my door, wanting me to sign a warning]

But I really like the idea that we could so strike at a major root cause of a major issue. It gives us a point of attack. We have an understanding: violence hurts our health. We have an action item: preventing/reducing violence will improve our health and lower our health care costs. And as in basketball: competent execution of a philosophically sound game plan can lead to a whole lot of happy in the Health Arena too.

I'm still in the understanding phase. If you'd like to join me, here are links to information about the link between violence and health:

If you don't like to read study reports, here is a 4-minute video via "someone on Twitter."